# On the double-think fallacy of pi as a ‘constant’ (likewise phi, e and root two);

on the significance of algorithms that run *for* eternity (not *to* infinity)

## Prologue

The rapper has his bling, the professor has π, φ and √2 (on a charm bracelet, metaphorically speaking). The fashion accessory ‘$’ is backed by street cred, while its ancestor, the Almighty Dollar, was backed by gold. What backs π, φ and √2? The short answer: Nothing; they need no backing since mathematics is *only* about (surface) logic: “We repeat that the sole question confronting the pure mathematician [...] is not whether [his/her postulates and conclusions] are true, but whether the alleged conclusions are in fact the *necessary logical consequences* of the initial assumptions” (Nagel/Newman, *Gödel’s Proof*, page 12, original italics). While mathematics thus strives to present a purely logic-imbued face to the world (see also Jourdain 64-68 re mathematics and Mathematics, logic and Logic), we contend that much of the field is held captive by a kind of double-think tradition, of which its participants seem barely aware.

Take the case of π, which actually entails triple-think. It is simultaneously [1] a so-called ‘constant’ safe on black velvet in the Museum at the End of the Universe; [2] a dynamic elusive ‘irrational’ whose algorithm keeps spewing digits forever; and [3] the thing defined — with a perfectly straight face — as the ‘ratio’ C:D where, if D=1.000, then C is necessarily irrational, hence forbidden to be used in *any* ratio — except by special dispensation for Very Important Pi. Not all the axiomatic and postulational tap-dancing in the world would be loud enough to drown out the pedal-point of chicanery that is thus ever-present in the field (not globally, but specifically in connection with totemic π and its kindred: φ, √2 and e). Here you will learn to appreciate the Dedekind Cut as the proverbial Solution in Search of a Problem, as we replace it by sundry algorithms that run — not *to* Infinity — but *for* Ever (a grown-up concept).

Our primary theme is Algorithms that run versus Icons that sit in trophy cases.

Our secondary theme is Eternity in the universe versus Infinity in the schoolyard.

Continued